Thursday, March 13, 2014

How does using the recumbent exercise bike compare with walking?




treefrog


I have knee and back problems. I've been having pain from my walks. So I was wondering if a recumbent bike would give me comparable benefits?

Thanks in advance for your answers!!! :)



Answer
A recumbent bike involves fewer muscle groups than walking. Because of that, it's less effective. If you have trouble with walking however, it becomes a decision about pain vs. benefits.

walking > recumbent bike
recumbent bike > no exercise

Stationary bikes: recumbent or upright exercise bike?




eraserhead


There are two stationary exercise bikes for ~$150 from the same company--both have great reviews, and the only difference is that one is recumbent (lean back) while the other is upright (like a normal bicycle).

What are the benefits and drawbacks of each? e.g., would the upright bike utilize more muscle groups, or is the only difference just personal preference/comfort?

This: http://www.walmart.com/ip/Exerpeutic-Space-Saver-Magnetic-Upright-Exercise-Bike-with-Heart-Pulse-Sensors/19526003 is the upright bike. This: http://www.amazon.com/Exerpeutic-400XL-Folding-Recumbent-Bike/dp/B004O6TXVS/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1394142476&sr=8-2&keywords=exercise+bike+recumbent is the recumbent bike.



Answer
Check the local paper and Craig's list for a used one stationary bikes are very boring. If you have a real bike put that on a trainer instead.

You need to go though butt train on a real bike or an upright stationary bike so real cyclists use that.

The recumbent does not require near as much butt training.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

No comments:

Post a Comment